“My brother Bob doesn’t want to be in government – he promised Dad he’d go straight.” (John F. Kennedy)

Have sympathy for me reader, for it’s started and it won’t stop until 7 May. We are having a national election, which means turning on the news is to hear about how the various parties interpret the same statistics entirely differently, each claiming a victory for themselves; incessant party political broadcasts with production values only slightly above a year seven video project; smug campaigning by politicians desperately trying to disguise their smugness in a series of cringey set pieces to convince us they are in touch with something called ‘the ordinary man’…it goes on, and on, and on…

I’m going to cheer myself up with a picture of Rik Mayall (works every time)as Alan B’Stard in The New Statesman, a brilliant piece of satire about Thatcher’s government:


Image from here

“We hear an awful lot of leftie whingeing about NHS waiting lists. Well the answer’s simple. Shut down the health service. Result? No more waiting lists. You see, in the good old days, you were poor, you got ill and you died. And yet these days people seem to think they’ve got some sort of God-given right to be cured. And what is the result of this sloppy socialist thinking? More poor people. In contrast, my policies would eradicate poor people, thereby eliminating poverty. And they say that we Conservatives have no heart.”

Resistance is futile, so I’m embracing it this week by looking at writing about politics. Drama seemed to be the way to go, as there is much discussion at the moment about political theatre. James Graham’s play The Vote, is being broadcast live on election night, a real time drama about a polling station, making the link between theatre and politics explicit. It also means there’ll be something to watch other than endless exit poll speculation, for which I am truly grateful (I will be voting by the way, I just hate all the politicking).

Firstly, Stuff Happens by David Hare, which premiered at the National Theatre in 2004.  A ‘recent history’ play, the title comes from Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld’s reaction on being told that there was looting in Iraq after Saddam Hussein’s deposition.  Watching a recent history play is a strange business, presenting events that will have had an immediate impact on our lives.  The play considers the run-up to the Iraq War, and Hare does a great job of balancing factual information and dramatic action; public speeches and imagined private conversations.  He looks at the main government players in the US and UK, exploring the political manoeuvring that occurs when no-one’s too sure exactly what the fight is:

“Rumsfeld.  I liked what you said earlier, sir. A war on terror. That’s good. That’s vague.

Cheney.  It’s good.

Rumsfeld. That way we can do anything.”

This obfuscation through meaningless rhetoric seems to be part of the politics of our age.  In this instance, we know what it led to, and Stuff Happens could be a very bleak and cynical play.  However, I think Hare encourages scepticism rather than cynicism when it comes to politics, using our knowledge of how events played out to deepen our understanding of why stuff happens, presenting the person behind the politician. There is heightened dramatic irony running through imagined private dialogue like this:

“Blair. I’ve been thinking. I’ve had this idea. I need…I think it might help if we had some sort of dossier. A kind of dossier.”

The knowledge that this ‘sexed-up’ ‘dodgy dossier’ would haunt Blair’s remaining time in office means the audience/reader witnesses this tentative suggestion with a sense of dread.  It’s a tough job to make politics entertaining when you have a duty to those who have lived it to keep to the facts, but Hare balances it all beautifully, and creates an entertaining and thought-provoking piece that is responsible but not dogmatic.  There are even opportunities for some wry humour, in this instance from the mouth of Secretary of State Colin Powell:

“There’s an element of hypocrisy, George. We were trading with the guy!  Not long ago. People keep asking, how do we know he’s got weapons of mass destruction? How do we know? Because we’ve still got the receipts.”


Image from here          

Secondly, another (less) recent history play, Democracy by Michael Frayn, which also premiered at the National, in 2003.  Set in West Berlin in 1969, it tells the story of Chancellor Willy Brandt, the first liberal-leaning Chancellor elected in Germany since before World War II, and his personal assistant Gunter Guillaume, who had begun life in East Germany, and was spying on the Chancellor for the Stasi.  The playtext describes the setting as:

“a complex of levels an spaces; of desks and chairs; of files and papers; also of characters, who mostly remain around the periphery of the action when not actually involved in it, listening or unobtrusively involved in their work”

This captures the bureaucracy and paranoia of Cold War government, the environment in which Willy Brandt tried to effect change whilst being a bit…ineffectual.

“Brandt. Let’s talk about it. See if we can’t find a solution that keeps everyone happy.

Schmidt. You can’t keep everyone happy, Willy! Not if you’re running a government!  We’ve got come to a decision!

Brandt. Thank you, Helmut.  What do the rest of us feel…?”

These days Germany is such a powerful world leader, it can be easy to forget the fragility of its post-war state.  Even in 1969 Brandt was faced with:

“Two Germanies, broken apart like the old shattered masonry. This is the material out of which we have to build the world we’re going to be living in tomorrow. This is the only material we possess – the two Germanies as they actually are. Riddled with doubts and suspicions on both sides.”

As the government tries to navigate a way forward, Brandt and Guillaume’s relationship adds to the complexity of the situation, as Guillaume’s Stasi handler observes:

“You and Willy. You’re like some old couple who’ve been married for forty years.  He goes down so you go down.  He comes up again and….”

Democracy is a subtle, intelligent study of people and politics in a time where nothing is straightforward.  Brandt and Willy distrust each other and rely on each other in a symbiotic relationship that defies easy definition.  It’s a play about politics but Democracy also succeeds on a very human level.


Image from here

If the electioneering has left you feeling somewhat jaded about politics, let’s end by looking back to the politics of the past, noble statesmen concerning themselves with issues of great import…

12 thoughts on ““My brother Bob doesn’t want to be in government – he promised Dad he’d go straight.” (John F. Kennedy)

  1. Oh Madame Bibi, if you are into plays etc about Western democracy, Western politics, then I MUST loudly bang all sorts of gongs for what I still believe to be the best Drama Series ever – the 1996 finally made it to the small screen version of Peter Flannery’s 1982? 1983? Our Friends In The North, which by the time it got made was a searing indictment of the North South divide, corruption and sleaze at the heart of government, local government, all centred around a group of 4 friends and their journey 1964-1995. It tiook in changing private and public views of morality, ever-pertinent debates about social housing, the rise of Thatcherism, the miners strike, the cleaning up of Soho and corruption in the Met and the list goes on…

    Stunning, blazing performances from an amazing cast. And available on DVD (though only Region 2, Europe version) thanks, no doubt, to the fact that a couple of the leads went on to becomes highly popular in mainstream culture – Christopher Ecclestone as Dr Who, and, 3 years out of drama school the then completely unknown Daniel Craig with an absolutely searing star performance about as far away from James Bond as its possible to get.

    Having by chance found the DVD I’m deep within watching (9 hours worth) it will no doubt at all surface on my blog in due course. I’m utterly delighted to find it is holding up absolutely as being as gripping and thought provoking as I remembered, as well as rather wringing out your emotions as well as your thoughts at every opportunity. AND a great soundtrack too, using music of the time most pertinently.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Excellent recommendation Lady Fancifull! I watched it when it first came out but I haven’t seen it since – I didn’t realise that was almost 20 years ago (where does the time go….)

      I will definitely have a re-watch, as you say it’s stood the test of time. You’ve made me realise I’ve never read it as a play. I’ll have to hunt down a copy, it would be interesting to see the difference between the play version and the many hours of TV it became.

      It was one of the first things I saw Mark Strong in, and I became such an admirer of his acting. As for Daniel Craig as Geordie – well, it’s been nearly 20 years but in all honesty I think I’m still recovering – what a heartbreaking performance.


      • I completely agree, it was Craig’s Geordie that absolutely stuck in my mind as one which tore you apart.

        I know the original play obviously covered a much shorter period of time, and it was the stop go, stop go attempts to produce it as TV drama that meant there were many more years to add on, many more issues to look at. I guess this was one of those things that became so amazing simply because the blocks in its way (money, scheduling and then later, the whole T Dan Smith, John Poulson, bribes for and corruption reaching into national as well as local government, got the legals worried, and then, the Beeb was under attack from the Thatcher Government for its left-wing bias, and its drama output was part of that – eg Boys From The Blackstuff. The little booklet with the DVD set is very interesting – but i kind of now yearn for someone to bring out a book on the the making of Our Friends In The North, which would probably have as much to say about the spirit of the times as the drama itself!

        Liked by 1 person

        • That’s really interesting – I find it fascinating how external pressures can change a creative piece of work in that way. Someone should definitely write the ‘making of…’ book – surely the star value of Christopher Eccleston & Daniel Craig would ensure it sold well? I would buy it 🙂

          Liked by 1 person

          • One of my favourite books about the story behind a film was Final Cut, by Steven Bach, the tangled and convoluted story behind the making of Michael Cimino’s Heaven’s Gate ‘the film that sank United Artists’ – it was published and re-published with slightly different subtitles, and was a fascinating account of film-making.

            Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.