Sweet Days of Discipline – Fleur Jaeggy (1989, trans. Tim Parks, 1991) 101 pages
Sweet Days of Discipline is told in a straightforward, clear style, as is evident from its opening line:
“At fourteen I was a boarder at a school in the Appenzell.”
The narrator is a loner at her 1950’s boarding school, full of the confusing, contradictory desires of someone on the brink of adulthood.
“I ate an apple and walked. I was looking for solitude, and perhaps the absolute. But I envied the world.”
She has to sleep in the part of the school for younger girls as there isn’t room for her. Her mother is in Brazil, her father is disinterested. She gets up at 5am every day to take long solitary walks. Then Frédérique, a banker’s daughter, arrives into this isolated and lonely life. Frédérique has a remote, unknowable quality. She is a nihilist and the narrator vows to dominate her:
“I still thought that to get something you had to go straight for your goal, whereas it’s only distractions, uncertainty, distance that bring us closer to our targets, and then it is the target that strikes us.”
The story isn’t overtly sexual and the sado-masochism is burgeoning, implicit rather than explicit. The narrator is scarcely aware of the sexual drives that surround her “passione” for Frédérique. It’s a psychologically complex and unarticulated morass of feeling, and it stays that way as she looks back from adulthood.
“Even now, I can’t bring myself to say I was in love with Frédérique, it’s such an easy thing to say.”
Frédérique remains mysterious and unknowable. She has a quality which sets her apart from her peers, which is both compelling and disturbing.
“She already knew everything, from the generations that came before her. She had something the others didn’t have; all I could do was justify her talent as a gift passed on from the dead.”
Although the narrator is looking back, Sweet Days of Discipline is not remotely sentimental. It has a brittle clarity which means that although very little happens, reading it is an immersive experience.
“And perhaps they were the best years, I thought. Those years of discipline. There was a kind of elation, faint but constant throughout all those years of discipline, the sweet days of discipline.”
I was a bit 50/50 on this one. Loved the writing style but I think I was expecting more suspense (maybe suspense is not the right word…?).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do know what you mean Kate, there’s something about the style that makes you think something is going to happen! I was surprised when it didn’t, but still really enjoyed it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘Brittle clarity’ is great. I love the unusual and wide-ranging choices you’re reading in May.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Simon! I’m glad you think so, because the first time I did NADIM I planned carefully. but this year I’ve just gone with what I feel like reading next. I’m really enjoying your choices too!
LikeLike
Interesting, Madame B – I’ve read one by her (very short indeed) and I liked it a lot. I do have another collection of short pieces somewhere in the stacks but not this one. It does sound intriguing…
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is the first of hers I’ve read so I’m not sure if it’s typical of her style or not, but I think you might like this Kaggsy. I’d be interested to read more by her so good to hear you’ve had a positive experience.
LikeLike
I hadn’t come across this one before but The Water Statues is on my list to look up since it seemed very intriguing and strange.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just googled The Water Statues as I’d not heard of it, and it does sound very experimental and unusual! Thanks for mentioning it Mallika, I’ll look out for it 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was Janakay’s review from You Might as Well Read that put me on to it. So very different to anything I’ve come across
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’ve summed this one up very well – I read it a couple of years back and quite enjoyed its cool style,
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Cathy – good to hear you enjoyed it too 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read this a few years ago, I really liked the writing, but I can’t say I was as struck by it as many readers have been.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it’s definitely one for a particular mood – I can imagine if I’d read it at a different time i could have felt quite distanced by it, but I caught it at the right time.
LikeLike
I’ve seen quite a lot of love (or admiration?) for this author on Twitter, but not many reviews or descriptions of her work. That cool, distancing effect definitely comes across it the quotes you’ve chosen. She sounds a little like Tove Ditlevsen, whose Copenhagen Trilogy I loved despite the stark/brittle style.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes I think she’s easier to admire rather than love Jacqui, because of that cool style. I’ve not read Tove Ditlevsen though I definitely want to, it’s interesting to hear the comparison. I quite enjoy the style so I’ll look forward to the trilogy.
LikeLike